How much does it cost to build a new office building?

If you’re one of those builders who’s been struggling to get new office space in the city, you’re probably wondering if your job is in danger.

You may be right.

According to a new report from the New York City Department of Buildings, construction companies are struggling to meet the demand and inventory that they’ve been given.

The department’s data is based on the city’s annual construction budget, which is the total amount of money the city is spending on building projects.

But there’s also a part of the budget that’s not spent on building.

The city uses that money to pay off the loans that were already issued by developers and homeowners, the money that was already spent on projects when the city decided to spend the money.

The data, which the city published last week, shows that the average loan to construction companies is $25,000, or $1,853 per year.

That’s the same amount that construction companies have paid on average since the financial crisis, and it’s the largest annual amount of debt the city has ever had to pay to banks and other lenders.

The report notes that some of that debt was originally meant to pay down the cost of the projects they were building, but the city was using the money to repay loans that had already been issued.

Some of the new loans were also issued to help pay down loan balances that developers had taken on when they didn’t meet the construction deadlines.

And some of those loan balances are in the tens of millions of dollars.

The loans aren’t new.

They were approved in the wake of the financial meltdown.

The issue has been around for years, though it was mostly limited to construction.

The construction loan rates are based on a construction company’s profit margin, which can vary widely depending on the project.

But the issue has made it into the spotlight recently, with a group of lawmakers trying to pass legislation that would cap construction loan amounts.

In a statement, the city said it wants to work with lawmakers to find ways to keep construction loans affordable.

But if the city can’t do that, there are ways to try to address it.

One of those options could be to use a cap on the amount of construction loans the city issues.

Under that plan, the amount the city could issue would gradually shrink over time.

The new report, however, indicates that building projects would be subject to the cap if the caps are not in place.

So it may not be the solution to keeping construction costs low that’s being sought, but it may be a way to help mitigate the impact of those rising costs. 

The new report also includes information about how many new construction loans were issued during the year, but there were no data on how many were issued on time.

This is important because the city isn’t allowed to provide data on the date or the total cost of projects it approves.

That information is necessary to determine whether there’s a reasonable likelihood that projects could be delayed or canceled, the department says.

The building loan rates, the biggest factor in the data, are not available for all projects, but they’re not hard to find.

In the past, the data was based on information provided by builders and the city itself.

However, the report said that the data isn’t accurate for all construction projects because there’s an issue with how information is collected.

The project information is then sent to a computer system that compares it with the numbers from lenders that are approved to help determine whether the project should go ahead or not.

However there’s no way to compare the numbers for each project.

In some cases, there may be some discrepancy between the numbers provided by lenders and the numbers the city uses to determine the project’s approval.

The same is true for some loan numbers, which might not be available.

So, for example, the project that the city approved for $15 million to build the headquarters for the New Jersey Transit system might have a loan rate of $2,000 higher than the loan rate approved for the $3.9 million project approved for a hotel.

This could make it difficult for the city to know if the $15-million hotel project was approved at a higher rate or if there’s still some discrepancy.